Short communication: Evaluation of the physical and chemical properties of some agricultural wastes as poultry litter material

Danial Farhadi

Abstract


The physical and chemical properties of some agricultural wastes included wheat straw, sugarcane bagasse, sugarcane peat; rice hulls as well as wood sheaving and sawdust as the control were examinedfor determinetheir potential as poultry bedding materials. Sugarcane bagasse and peat compared to other materials had greater initial moisture content (P<0.05) and there were no significant difference between other materials. The highest and lowest water holding capacity (WHC) was related to sugarcane peat (548.14%) and rice hulls (116.70%), respectively (P<0.05). Water releasing capacity (WRC) was significantly affected only in two hours after socking the materials in water so that the highest and lowest WRC were related to rice hulls (6.03%) and peat (1.75%), respectively (P<0.05). The highest and lowest pH values were related to peat (7.26%) and sawdust (4.60%), respectively (P<0.05). The highest and lowest bulk densitywere related to sawdust (182.51 kg/m3) andbagasse (46.28 kg/m3), respectively (P<0.05). The highest and lowest nitrogen (N) percentage values were also related to wheat straw (0.39%) and sawdust (0.01%), respectively (P<0.05). In conclusion, ricehulls due to its favorable properties could be successfully used as alternative poultry litter material. Peat was not a satisfactory material for applying as poultry bedding. In contrast to peat, bagasse due to similar properties to straw seems to have good potential for using aspoultry litter material.


Keywords


Agricultural waste, physical and chemical properties, litter, poultry

Full Text:

HTML PDF EPUB XML

References


Al-Homidan, A., J.F. Robertson,and A.M. Petchey. 2003. Review of the effect of ammonia and dust concentrations on broiler performance. World’s. Poult. Sci. J. 59:340–349.

AOAC. 1994. Association of official analytical chemists. Official Methods of Analysis. Methods of Analysis. 16th ed. AOAC, Washington, DC.

Atapattu, N.S.B. M., and K.P. Wickraramasinghe. 2007. The use of refused tea as litter material for broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 86:968–972.

Brake, D.J., C.R. Boyle, T.N. Chamblee, C.D. Schultz, and E.D. Peebles. 1992. Evaluation of the chemical and physical properties of hardwood bark used as a broiler litter material. Poult. Sci. 41:467–472.

Carlile, F.S. 1984. Ammonia in poultry houses. a literature review. World’s. Poult. Sci. J. 40:99–113.

Coufal, C.D., C. Chavez, P.R. Niemeyer, and J.B. Carey. 2006. Nitrogen emissions from broilers measured by mass balance over eighteen consecutive flocks. Poult. Sci. 85:384–391.

Davasgaium, M.M., and A.A. Boodoo. 1997. Litter management: use of bagasse as a potential source of litter material for broiler production. Proceedings of the second annual meeting of agricultural scientists, Reduit, Mauritius, 12-13 August 139–145.

Garcês, A., S.M.S. Afonso, A. Chilundo, and C.T.S. Jairoce. 2013. Evaluation of different litter materials for broiler production in a hot and humid environment: 1. litter characteristics and quality. J. Appl. Pout. Res. 22:168–176.

Grimes, J.L., J. Smith, and C.M. Williams. 2002. Some alternative litter materials used for growing broiler and turkeys. World’s. Poult. Sci. J. 58:515–526.

Harms, R.H., C.F. Simpson, P.W. Waldroup, and C.B. Ammerman. 1968. Citrus pulp for poultry litter and its subsequent feeding value for ruminants. Florida Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin. No. 724.

Hester, P.Y., A.L. Sutton, R.G. Elkin, and P.M. Klingensmith. 1985. The effect of lighting, dietary amino acids and litter on the incidence of leg abnormalities and performance of turkey toms. Poult. Sci. 64:2062–2075.

Khosravinia, H. 2006. Effect of oiling and antimicrobial spray of litter performance of broiler chicken reared on leaves and corn cob bedding materials under heat stress condition. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 19:35–42.

Malone, G.W. 1992. Evalution of litter materials other than wood shaving. 1992 Proceeding of the National Poultry Waste Management Symposium. National Poultry Waste Management Symposium Committee. Auburn, AL. 274-284.

Malone, G.W., P.H. Allen, G.W. Chaloupka, and W.F. Ritter. 1982. Recycled paper products as broiler litter. Poult. Sci. 61:2116–2165.

Moore, P.A., W.E. Huff, T.C. Daniel, D.R. Edwards, and D.M. Miller. 1996. Evaluation of chemical amendments to reduce ammonia volatilization from poultry litter. Poult. Sci. 75:315–320.

Ruszler, P.L., and J.R. Carson. 1974. Physical and biological evaluation of five litter materials. Poult. Sci. 41:249–254.

Smith, R.C. 1956. Kind of litter and breast blisters on broilers. Poult. Sci. 35:593–595.

Watkins, S.E. 2001. Evaluation of bagasse as an alternative bedding material for poultry. Arkansas Extension Brief. Center of Excellence for Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, A.R.

Zifei, L., L. Wang, D. Beasley, and O. Oviedo. 2007. Effect of moisture content on ammonia emissions from broiler litter: a laboratory study. J. Atmos. Chem. 58:41–53.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c)