Comparison of Broiler Performance in Two Conventional and Environmentally Controlled Modern Broiler Houses at Tropics

Danial Farhadi, Seyed Majid Hosseini

Abstract


The purpose of this study was to evaluate broiler performance, environmental conditions and litter quality in two conventional and environmentally controlled condition modern broiler houses. Two consecutive experiments were conducted using 60800 one day old broiler chicks (Ross 308 strain) on a commercial poultry farm included two types of conventional and environmentally controlled modern broiler houses during summer and winter seasons of Shoush, Khuzestan province of Iran. In each experiment, a total of 30400 day-old broilers were placed into both houses. Average temperature and relative humidity of the ambient and inside of the conventional and environmentally controlled condition modern houses during summer and winter at two experiments were 39.4ºC, 30.5ºC, 29.3 ºC and 40.1%, 45.3%, 44.4%, and 12.9ºC, 28.5ºC, 28.6 ºC and 36.8%, 45.2%, 39.5 %, respectively. Bird performance including live body weight, feed intake, feed conversion ratio, mortality rate, production efficiency index and litter pH, moisture content and air ammonia levels were not significantly affected by types of the houses. However, the chickens grown in the environmentally controlled condition modern house, although raised at higher stocking density (21 vs. 16 Birds/m2) than conventional house, had numerically lower mortality rate and greater production efficiency index probably due to improved environmental conditions trough proper ventilation applied in environmentally controlled condition modern house than conventional house. In conclusions, application of environmentally controlled condition modern house in addition of greater production efficiency index and less mortality rate can be useful in increasing stocking density of broiler chickens compared to conventional houses

Keywords


Poultry house; environmental condition, ventilation; performance; broiler chicken

Full Text:

HTML PDF EPUB XML

References


Akyus, A. 2009. Effects of some climates parameters of environmentally uncontrollable broiler houses on broiler performance. J. Anim. Vet. Adv. 8:2608–2612.

Bilgili, S. F., and J. B. Hess. 1995. Placement density influences broiler carcass grade and meat yields. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 4:384–389.

Czarick, M., and M. Lacy. 1990. Tunnel vs. conventional. The University of Georgia, Cooperative extension service, College of agricultural and environmental science/Athens, Georgia. 30602–4356.

Dawkins, M. S., C. A. Donnelly, and T. A. Jones. 2004. Chicken welfare is influenced more by housing conditions than by stocking density. Nature. 427:342–344.

DozierIII, W. A., B. D. Lott, and S. L. Branton. 2005. Live performance of male broilers subjected to constant or increasing air velocities at moderate temperatures with a high dew point. Poult. Sci. 84:1328–1331.

Estevez, J. 2007. Density allowances for broilers: where to set the limits? Poult. Sci. 86:1265–1272.

Farhadi, D., A. K. Hatami Sharifabadi, M. Hemati, and S. M. Hosseini. 2012. Comparison of broiler performance in two conventional and tunnel ventilated broiler house in summer season. In: Proc. 5th National Congress on Animal Science. Isfahan. Uni. Tech., Isfahan, Iran. p. 191.

Feddes, J. J. R., E. J. Emmanuel, and M. J. Zuidhof. 2002. Broiler performance, body weight variance, feed and water intake, and carcass quality at different stocking densities. Poult. Sci. 81:774–779.

Furlan, R. L., M. Macari, E. R. Secato, J. R. Guerreiro, and E. B. Malheiros. 2000. Air velocity and exposure time to ventilation affect body surface and rectal temperature of broiler chickens. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 9:1–5.

Knizatova, M., S. Mihina, J. Broucek, I. Karandusovska, and J. Macuhova. 2010. The influence of litter age, litter temperature and ventilation rate on ammonia emissions from a broiler rearing facility. Czech. J. Anim. Sci. 55:337–345.

Lacy, M.P., and Czarick, M. 1992. Tunnel-ventilated broiler houses: broiler performance and operating costs. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 1:104–109.

Liang, Y., M. T. Kidd, S. E. Watkins, and G. T. Tabler. 2013. Effect of commercial broiler house retrofit: a 4-year study of live performance. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 22:211–216.

Lin, H., H. C. Jiao, J. Buyse, and E. Decuypere. 2006. Strategies for preventing heat stress in poultry. Worlds. Poult. Sci. J. 62:71–85.

Lott, B.D., J.D. Simmons, and J.D. May. 1998. Air velocity and high temperature effects on broiler performance. Poult. Sci. 77:391–393.

NRC. 1994. Nutrient Requirements of Poultry. 9th revised ed.. National Academie Press. Washington, D.C.

Puron, D., R. Santamaria, and J. C. Segura. 1997. Sodium bicarbonate and broiler performance at high stocking densities at tropical environment. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 6:443–448.

Puron, D., R. Santamariaand, J. C. Segura, and J. Alamilla. 1995. Broiler performance at different stocking densities. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 4:55–60.

Shanawany, M.M. 1988. Broiler performance under high stocking densities. Bri. Poult. Sci. 29:43–52.

Shane, S.M. 1994. The relationship of temperature and relative humidity on performance of flocks. Zootecnica Internacional. 17:92–95.

Zuidhof, M.J., J.J.R. Feddes , F.E. Robinson and C. Riddell. 1993. Effect of ventilation rate and stocking density on turkey health and performance. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 2:123–129.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c)