Effect of specie on the mineral and proximate composition of raw meats and ‘Kilishi’ produced from beef and camel meats towards reducing food wastage in food in secured environment: a case study of Kano state, Nigeria

Kazeem Suleiman Ayorinde, B.F. Muhammad

Abstract


The study was conducted at the Department of Animal Science, Bayero University Kano. Kano State of Nigeria. Kano lies between latitude 13°N in the north and 11° in the south and longitude 8° west in the west and 10° in the east in the semi- arid region of Northern Nigeria. The State occupies a land area of 20,760 km square with a population of 9,383,682 people (Census, 2006). Hausa-Fulani are the major ethnic groups in the area and Islam is the dominant religion. The climate of Kano is hot during dry season and cold during Harmattan. The ambient temperature ranges from 16.6°C to 42.8°C in the months of January to June and 23.9°C to 26.7°C in July to December (Anonymous, 2010). An average monthly precipitation of 0 to 30mm was recorded in January to June and 780 to 1320mm in July to December (KNARDA, 2001). Trading is the major occupation of the people living in the metropolis of Kano while in other areas farming is the main occupation. Meats from the Longissimus dorsi of the hind limb of camel and cattle were used for the experiment. 4kg of Kilishi was produced each from cattle and camel meats. The proximate composition of fresh raw meats and processed Kilishi were determined using the standard procedure of AOAC (1990). Ash of the samples was analyzed for macro (Na, K, P, Ca, Mg.) and micro (Cd, Co, Mn and Fe) minerals using Atomic Absorption Spectrophometre. The result showed low moisture content in beef (14.05%), and camel meat Kilishi (15.05%). Protein contents of beef and camel meat Kilishi were 60.50% and 64.83%, respectively. Fat content of beef (7.80%) and camel meat Kilishi (6.40%) were higher than that of raw beef (2.86%) and camel meat (3.45%). Sodium (Na) content of beef and camel meat Kilishi were 804.55mg/kg and 799.79mg/kg respectively significantly (P<0.05) higher than 489.96mg/kg and 395.81mg/kg recorded on raw products. No significant difference was recorded on Ca content of the products. Recorded values on K and Mg were higher in raw meat compared to Kilishi. Cd, Co and Fe of beef Kilishi were higher than other products except for Mn which showed no significant difference. It was concluded that processing had no effect on the mineral composition of Kilishi. It was recommended that fresh camel and cattle meats could be processed into Kilishi to extend their shelf lives.


Keywords


mineral, proximate compositioon, kilishi, beef, camel meats

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abubakar, M. M., Bube, M. M., Adegbola, T. A. and Oyawoye, E. O. (2011). Processing and evaluation of dambu, tsire and balangu from non-ruminant animals. ACT-Biotechnology Research Communications 49-55.

Agranosa, F. C. and Bandian, M. M. (2008) Utilization of Carabeef and Chevon in Sausage and Meat Loaf Products. Journal of Health Population and Nutrition 25(3): 351-358.

AOAC (1990). Methods of the Association of Official Analysis Chemists. Official methods of analysis Virginia Association. Official Analytical Chemists, U.S.A. 15:261–267.

Ezekwe, A. G., Okonwo, T. M., Ukaegbu, U. G. and Sangode, A. A. (1997). Preliminary Study of Meat Quality Characteristics of Young Ndama and Muturu Bulls. Nigerian Journal of Animal Production. 24(1): 79-85.

Fakolade, P.O., Omojola, A. B and Afolabi, K.D. (2006) Physical characteristics of camel muscle compared with three breeds of cattle. ASAN Proceedings, 11th Annual Conference. 18th – 21st Sept., 2006. pp. 304 -306.

Idowu, I., Atinuke, O., Omobuwajo, T. O. and Falade, K. O. (2010). Production proximate analysis and shelf life studies of ready-to-eat rice and kilishi. African Journal of Food Science Vol 4.(5) pp. 264- 268 May, 2010. http://www.academicjournals.org/ajfs

Igene, J. O. and Mohammed I.D. (1983) Consumer Preferences and Attitude to suya: Annual Indigenous Meat Product Annals of Borno 1: 169-178.

Igene, J.O., Farouk, M.M. and Akanbi, C.T. (1990). Preliminary Studies on the Traditional Processing of Kilishi. Journal of Science, Food and Agriculture, 50: 89-98.

Leistner, L. (1987). Shelf stable products and intermediate moisture foods based on meat. In “Water Actuity; Theory and Application to Foods”, (Rockland LB, Beuchat LR eds). 295–327. Dekker, New York.

Mbofung, C.M.F. (1993). The Effects of Traditional African Method of Meat Processing on the Availability of Iron and other Minerals from the Finished Product (Kilishi) Following in vitro Enzymolysis. In the Proceedings of Bioavailability 93 Conference, pp: 169-174.

Muhammad, B. F. and Umar, A. M. (2010). Processing Beef into Tsire and Balangu: Effects on Proximate Composition and Amino Acid Profile. Savanna Journal Agriculture. 5: 61-69.

Muhammad, B.F. and Abubakar, F.M. (2011). Chemical Composition of Raw and Cooked Camel (Camelus dromedarius) Meat Cuts. Savanna Journal of Agriculture. 6(2): 32 - 36 (2011).

Muhammad, B.F. and Muhammad, A.M. (2007). Effects of packaging materials and storage period on microbial load and organoleptic properties of kilishi. Tropical Journal of Animal Science.10(1&2):217-220.

Nikmaram, P., Mohamad, Y. and Zahra, E. (2011). Effect of cooking methods on chemical composition, quality and cook loss of camel muscle (Longissimus dorsi) in comparison with veal. African Journal of Biotechnology Vol. 10(51), 10478- 10483

Ogbonnaya, C. and Linus, I. I. (2009). Influence of Storage Conditions on Shelf-Life of Dried Beef Product (Kilishi). World Journal of Agricultural Sciences 5 (1): 34-39, 2009. ISSN 1817 3047

Ogunsola, O.O. and Omojola, A.B. (2008). Quantitative evaluation of Kilishi prepared from beef and pork. African Journal of Biotechnology 1753-1758.

Omojola, A.B. (2008). Yield and organoleptic characteristics of Suya (an intermediate moisture meat) prepared from 3 different muscles of a matured bull. African Journal of Biotechnology 2254- 2257.

Prescott, L.M., Harley, J.P., Klein, D.A. (2002). Microbiology, fifth ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.

Williams, P.G. (2007). Nutritional composition of red meat, 64(Suppl 4), S113-S119. The definitive version is available at www.blackwell-synergy.com.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Global Journal of Animal Scientific Research

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.