Evaluation of Calvarial Bone Thickness in One-Humped Camel Fetuses

Sunday Akau Hena, M.L. Sonfada, B.I. Onyeanusi, R.O.C. Kene, J.E. Onu, S.A. Shehu, A. Bello, A. Danmaigoro

Abstract


Thicknesses of the calvarial bones of one-humped camel (Camelus dromedarius) fetuses were evaluated. Thirty-two samples of first, second and third trimester fetuses obtained from Sokoto municipal abattoir were used for the study. The mean thicknesses for the frontal bones are 1.30±0.02mm, 1.47±0.08mm and 1.54±0.07mm for the 1st, 2nd and 3rd trimester respectively.  Parietal bones of the fetuses belonging to the 1st, 2nd and 3rd trimester had their values as 1.42±0.01mm, 1.435±0.12mm and 1.49±0.02mm respectively. Interparietal bones had mean values as 1.505±0.01mm, 2.36±0.03mm and 2.415±0.04mm at the 1st, 2nd and 3rd trimesters respectively. Occipital bones of the 1st, 2nd  and 3rd trimester fetuses had their mean values as 2.36±0.08mm, 2.57±0.01mm and 4.78±0.03mm respectively, while the temporal bones of the 1st, 2nd and 3rd trimester fetuses had their values as 1.28±0.04mm, 1.85±0.27mm and 3.17±0.05mm respectively. The study showed that there were variations in the bone thickness (BT) of the calvarial bones, with the frontal and parietal bones having the least thicknesses while the occipital bone had the highest BT values, thus, this could formed a basis for the consideration of the frontal and parietal regions in situation such as stunning with captive bolt pistol in humane slaughter of camel, as these bones overlying the brain in this region appeared thinner.


Keywords


Calvaria, Thickness, Camel; fetuses

Full Text:

PDF

References


Angel, L. (1971). Skull vault thickness variation. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 35,272.

Barnett, E., and Nordi, B.E.C. (1960). The radiological diagnosis of osteoporosis: A new approach. Clin Radiol., 11,166-169.

Bloom, R.A., and Bloom, M.B. (1980). A comparative estimation of the combined cortical thickness of various bone sites. Skeletal Radiol, 5,167-70.

Bloom, R.A., and Laws, J.W. (1970). Humeral cortical thickness as an index of osteoporosis in women. Br. J. Radiol., 43,522-527.

De-Schepper, J., De-Boeck, H., and Loius, O. (1996). Measurements of radial bone mineral density and cortical thickness in children by peripheral quantitative computed Tomography. Paediatric osteology: New developments in diagnostic therapy.

El-wishy, A.B., Hemeida, N.A., Omar, M.A., Mobarak, A.M., and El-Sayed, M.A.I. (1981.) Functional changes in the pregnant camel with special reference to fetal growth. Br. Vet. J., 137, 527-537.

Ernest, W.A. (1990). The National Medical series for Independent study. 2nd Edition Anatomy. National Medical Series. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, Hong Kong, Sydney, pp: 425-433.

Evans, H.E. (1993). Miller’s Anatomy of the Dog. W.B. Saunder’s Company, 3rd edition, pp: 59-71

Israel, H. (1973). Age Factor and the Pattern of Change in Craniofacial Structures. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 39,111-128.

Loveridge, N. (1999). Bone: More than a stick. J. Anim. Sci., 77(2), 190–196.

Mabbutt, L.W., and Kokich, V.G. (1979). Calvarial and sutural re-development following craniectomy in the neonatal rabbit. J. Anat., 129(2), 413-422.

Morgan, D.B., Spiers, F.W., Pulvertaft, C.M., and Fourman, P. (1967). The amount of bone in the metacarpal and the phalanx according to age and sex. Clin. Radiol., 18,101-8.

Roche, A.F. (1953). Increase in cranial thickness during growth. Human Biology, 25:81-92.

Ross, A.H., Jantz, R.L., and McCormick, W.F. (1998). Cranial thickness in American females and males. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 43, 267-72.

Smuts, M.S., and Bezuidenhout, A.J. (1987). Anatomy of the Dromedary, Oxford University Press, Wanton Street, Oxford OX2 6DP. pp: 1-10.

Virtama, P., and Telkkae, A. (1962). Cortical thickness as an estimate of mineral contents of human humerus and femur. Br. J. Radiol., 35, 632-33.

Virtana, P. (1976). Geographic difference in the thickness of cortical bone. Comparison between Welsh and Finnish population. Skeletal Radiol., 1,29-31.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Global Journal of Animal Scientific Research

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.