Productivity and Tonic Immobility Duration of Thai Crossbred Chickens Raised at Different Stocking Densities
Abstract
The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of stocking density (8, 12 and 16 birds/m2) on productivity and tonic immobility duration (a measure of fearfulness) of Thai crossbred chickens (n=900 birds) kept at 100 birds per pen. The results showed that stocking density had no significant (P>0.05) effect on body weight, body weight gain, feed intake, feed conversion ratio and mortality of chickens from the wk2 to 12. When stocking density was increased from 8 birds/m2 to 16 birds/m2, tonic immobility (TI) duration of the chickens increased significantly (P<0.05).However, the TI duration of chickens at a density of 12 birds/m2 was not significantly different from those of both the lower and the higher densities. In conclusion, Thai crossbred chickens could be stocked up to 12 birds/m2 without adverse effect on productivity and welfare when compared to those kept at 8 birds/m2.
Keywords
References
Andrews, S.M., H.M. Omed, and C.J.C. Phillips. 1997. The effect of a single or repeated period of high stocking density on the behavior and response to stimuli in broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 76:1655-1660.
Campo, J.L., M.T. Teresa, and S.G. Dávila. 2008. Association between vent pecking and fluctuating asymmetry, heterophil to lymphocyte ratio, and tonic immobility duration in chickens. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 113:87-97.
Dawkins, M.S., C.A. Donnelly, and T.A. Jones. 2004. Chicken welfare is influenced more by housing conditions than by stocking density. Nature. 427:342-344.
Estevez, I. 2007. Dynamics of aggression in the domestic fowl. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 76:307-325.
Feddes, J.J.R., E.J. Emmanuel, and M.J. Zuidhof. 2002. Broiler performance, body weight variance, feed and water intake, and carcass quality at different stocking densities. Poult. Sci. 81:774-779.
Haitook, T., E. Tawfik, and M.Zöbisch. 2003. Options for native chicken (Gallus domesticus) production in northeastern Thailand. In: Proc. The Conference on International Agricultural Research for Development. pp: 146-151.
Hall, A. L. 2001. The effect of stocking density on the welfare and behaviour of broiler chickens reared commercially. Anim. Welfare. 10:23-40.
Jones, T.A., C.A. Donnelly, and M.S. Dawkins. 2005. Environmental and management factors affecting the welfare of chickens on commercial farms in the United Kingdom and Denmark stocked at five densities. Poult. Sci. 84:1-11.
Marin, R.H., P. Freytes, D. Guzman, and J.R. Bryan. 2001. Effects of an acute stressor on fear and on the social reinstatement responses of domestic chicks to cagemates and strangers. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 71:57-66.
OnbaÅŸilar, E.E., Å. Poyraz, E. Erdem, and H. Åztűrk. 2008. Influence of lighting periods and stocking densities on performance, carcass characteristics and some stress parameters in broilers. Arch. Geflűgelk. 72:193-200.
Ravindran, V, D.V. Thomas, D.G. Thomas, P.C.H. Morel. 2006. Performance and welfare of broilers as affected by stocking density and zinc bacitracin supplementation. Anim. Sci. J. 77:110-116.
Thomas, D., V. Ravindran, D. Thomas, B. Camden, Y. Cottam, P. Morel, and C. Cook. 2004. Influence of stocking density on the performance, carcass characteristics and selected welfare indicators of broiler chickens. New Zealand Vet. J. 52:76-81.
Wattanachant, S., S.Benjakul, D. Ledward. 2004. Composition, color, and texture of Thai indigenous and broiler chicken muscles. Poult. Sci. 83:123-128.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c)