Development of Dry Season Supplements for Ruminants and Their Degradation Characteristics in the Semi Arid of Nigeria

Isaac Hyeladi Malgwi, Ibrahim Dukku Mohammed

Abstract


This experiment was conducted to develop dry season supplement for ruminants and their degradation characteristics. Ten (10) different rations were formulated, F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, F8, F9, and F10 using a mixture of different locally available feed ingredients with different inclusion levels which includes sorghum husk, maize bran, wheat offal, millet bran, rice bran, bran (dusa), cowpea husk (as energy source), cotton seed cake, groundnut haulms and poultry litter   (as protein source). Rumen degradation of the formulations revealed that at 6, 12 and 18 hours, F9 and F10 recorded significantly higher degradability with no statistical difference in degradability amongst F1 through to F8. At 48 hours of incubation period The % DM degradation for all the formulations is not significantly different which ranged from 76.50% - 79.84% DM while at 72hours it ranges between 78.84% - 83.67% DM degradability. The cost of production from this analysis showed that highest production cost was (N6100) equivalent to $39.35 while least production cost was (N2710) equivalent to $17.48. 20% inclusion level of poultry litter in ruminant ration will result in a significant increase in rumen DM degradation by stimulating activities of rumen microbes’ thereby increasing digestibility of crop-residues which are mostly fibrous in nature.



Keywords


Dry Season, Ruminants, Supplements, Semi Arid, Degradation Characteristics

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdulrazak, S.A., and T. Fujihara. 1990. Animal nutrition: A Laboratory manual Kwashiwaji Printing Co Japan, pp: 32 – 39.

Alhassan, W.S. 1988. Crop residue utilization with specialreferences to pastoral production: past, present and future. Proceedings, Natural conference on parforalism in Nigeria, 26-27th June 1988, pp: 70-87.

AOAC. 2000. Official Methods of Analysis. 17th Ed. Association of Official of Analytical Chemists, Gaithersburg. MD Germany.

Asrat, G.T., T. Berban, and M. Solomon. 2008. Inclusion of different proportions of poultry litter in the rations of yearling Hararghe Highland goats. Livestock Research for Rural Development. 20(3).

Bheekhee, H., B. Holman, A.A. Boodoo, R.K. Ramnauth, R.L.H. Yuen, R. Fakim, and B. Dobee. 2002. Development and Field Evaluation of Animals Feed Supplementation Packages for Improving Meat and Milk Production in Ruminant Livestock Using Locally Available Feed Resources. Proceedings of the Final Review Meeting of an IAEA Technical Cooperation Regional AFRA Project IAEA-TeCDOC-1294.

Blaxter K.L. 1980. Feeds as Sources of Energy for Ruminant Animals Massey-Ferguson Paper Massey-Ferguson (UK) Ltd.

Deaville, E.A., R.M. Augela, and D.I. Givens. 1994.The nutritive value and chemical composition of energy rich by-products for ruminant. Animal feed science and technology. 49:261-276.

Dibal, D.B. 1991. Chemical composition and feeding values of some browse plants in the semi arid region of North-Eastern Nigeria. M.Sc. Thesis. University of Maiduguri.

FAO. 1986. Food and Agriculture Organization, FAO Production Year Book, 40: 95 and 247.

Fialho, E.T., H.P. barbosa, and L.R.T. Albino. 1995. Chemical composition. Digestible proteinand energy values of some alternative feed stuffs for pigs in Brazil. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 55(3-4): 239–245

Gohl, B. 1981. Tropical feeds. Feed information and nutritive values FAO, Rome, 529 p.

Hadjipanayiotou, M., L. Verhaegh, M. Allen, A.R. Kronfoleh, L.M. Labban, A. Sharbaji, M. Alwali, M. Dasso, B. Shaker and M. Amin. 1993. Urea Blocks I: Methodology of Block Making and Diffefrent Formulae Tested in Syria. Livestock Research and Rural Development. http:/www.Cipaw.org.co/lrrd5/3/Syria.htm

Hui-ling, Xie, Hong – qiang, J., Zon – Hua, Liu and Ji-hua, Tang. 2009. Genetic Basis of Nutritional content of stover in maize under low nitrogen conditions. J. Euphytica. Vol 165, No 3/February 2009. pp: 485 483.

Ibrahim, M. 2006. Formulation and Production of Multinutrient Blocks Using Bran as an Energy Source in Semi-Arid Environment of Nigeria. Journal of Animal Production, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 147-155.

Ibrahim, M., Mubi, A. A., and Mohammed, I. D. 2012. Formulation and production of multinutrient blocks for ruminants in Semi-Arid environmentof Nigeria. Journal of Agriculture and veterinary sciences. Vol.3.

Ikram, U., A. Mohammed and F. Arifa. 2010. Chemical and nutritional properties of some maize (Zeamays L.) varieties grown in NWFP, Pakistan. Pakistan journal of Nutrition. 9 (11) 1113-1117.

Imade, A.A. 2004. Evaluation of Cotton seed cake as replacement for groundnut cake FAO Animal production and Health Series NO. 21 Rome.

Jackson, M.G. 1980. Feed formulation: University of Plant Nagar, India. Animal Feed Science technology. 6:101-104.

Kibon, A., and E.R. Orskov. 1993. The Use of Degradation Characteristics of Browse Plants to Predict Intake and Digestibility by Goats. J. Animal Production. 53: 10-14.

Kibon, A., F.I. Abbator, and I.D. Mohammed. 2001. Microbial protein yield from the rumen of goats fed treated sorghum stover supplement with cotton seed cake or browse. Proc. 6th Ani Sci of Nigeria Sept 17-19, 2001 held in Unimaid.

Kinfemi, A.A., M.L. Mohammed, and J.A. Ayode. 2009. Biodegradation of cowpea shells by pleurotus specie for its use as ruminant feed. World J. of Agric Sci. 5(5):639-645.

Lamidi, O.S., A.T. Omokanye, and D.D. Dung. 2006. Shoot term intake and insacco degradability of mixtures of ground haulms and Griricidiasepium by ruminants on the northern Guinea Savannah Zones of Nigeria. J. Amin and Vet. Advances. 5(12):1129-1132.

Leng R.A. 1990. Factors affecting the utilization of “par quality†forages by ruminants particularly under tropical conditions. Nutrient. Res Reviews. 3:273-303.

Leng, R.A., T.R. Preston, R. Sansoucy, and P.L. George Kuju. 1991. Multi nutrient blocks and strategy supplement for ruminants. World Animal Review. 67:11-19.

Lu, O.N., and N.S. Patchoiba. 1990. Feed intake and weight gain of growing goats fed diets of various energy and protein levels. J. Anim. Sci. 68: 1251-1259.

Maina, M.T. 2010. Feeding regime for ruminants in semi Arid- environment of North-eastern Nigeria. Final year project submitted to department of Animal Science. University of Maiduguri.

Mbaya, Y.P., T.F. Mbahi, Z.A. Gworgwor, and U. Gidado. 2014. Continental. J. Animal and Veterinary Research. 4(2): 10- 21.

McDonald, I. 1981: A revised model for the estimation of protein degradability in the rumen. Journal of Agricultural Science. 96: 251-252

Mcdonald, P., R.A. Edward and J.F.O. Greenhalgh. 1995. Animal Nutrition 5th Ed. English Language book society and Longman.

Mehrez A. Z. 1976. Assessment of the nitrogen requirement for rumen fermentation in sheep PhD. Thesis University of Aberdeen.

Miller, T.B., A.B. Rains, and R.J. Thorpe. 1984. The nutritive value and Agroeconomic aspects of some fodder in Northern Nigeria, Har and dry season residues. Journal of British Greenland society. 19:77-80.

Mlay, P.S., A.E. Pereka, S.T. Balthazary, E.J. Phiri, T. Hvelplund, M.R. Weisbjerg, J. Madsen. 2005. The Effect of Maize bran or Maize Bran mixed with sunflower cake on the performance of small holder dairy cows in urban and semi-urban area in Morogoro, Tanzania.

Mohammed, I.D., M. Baulube, and I. A. Adeyinka. 2007. Multinutrient Blocks 1: Formulation and Production under a Semi Arid Environment of Northern East Nigeria. Jounal of Biological Science. 7 (2):389-392.

Mubi, A.A., A. Kibon, and I. D. Mohammed. 2013. Formulation and production of multinutrient blocks for ruminants in the guinea savanna region of Nigeria. Agriculture and Biology Journal of North America. 4(3):205-215.

Nadeem, M.A, A. Ali, A. Azim and A.G. Khan. 1993. Effect of feeding broiler litter on growth and nutrient Utilization by Barbari goat. J. Agric. Sci.6:73- 77.

Nagpal, A.K., and M. Arora. 2002. Utilization of Guar Phalgati and Tree Leaves Based Complete Diets In Camel. Indian Journal of Animal Science. 72: 712-714.

Nicholson, J.W.G. 1984. Digestibility, nutritive values and intake.In:sundstol F, owen (eds straws and other fibrous feeds. Elsevier publishers, Amsterdam, Netherlands, pp: 85-90.

Norton, B.W. 1994. The nutritive value of tree legumes. in Forage Tree Legumes in Tropical Agriculture, R.C. Gutteridge, and H.M. Shelton, eds. Wallingford, Oxford: CAB International, pp: 177-191.

Onwuka, C.F.I. 1999. Molasses Block Supplementary Feed Resources for Ruminantsâ€, Animal Feed Science and Tech. 24: 15-19.

Orskov, E.R., F.D. Hovell, and F. Mould. 1980. The use of nylon bag techniques for the evaluation of feed stuffs. Tropical Animal production. 5:195-213.

Osuji, P.O., I.V. Nsahlai, and H. Khalili. 1993. Feed evaluation. ILCA Manual 5. ILCA (International Livestock Centre for Africa), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 40p.

Park, K.K., A.L. Goetsh, A.R. Pahl, B. Kouakou, L.A. Jr. Forster, D.L.Sr. Galloway, and Z.B. Johnson. 1995. Effects of xylose and soyabean meal additions to deep-stacked broiler litter on nutritive characteristics for ruminants. J. Appl. Anim. Res. 7:1-26.

Prasad, G.S., N.K.S. Gowda, and J.V. Ramana. 2001. Feeding Strategies To Enhance Animal Productivity, In: Proceedings Of The Xth Animal Nutrition Conference, NDRI, Kamal, India, 9-11th Nov. 2001. pp: 23-45.

Prasad, R.D.D., M.R. Reddy, and G.V.N. Reddy. 1998. Effect of feeding baled and stacked urea-treated rice straw on the performance of crossbred cows. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 73:347–352.

Preston, T.R., and R.A. Leng. 1987. Matching ruminant production system with available resources in the tropics Penumbul Book Armidate. Australia, 83p.

Rains, A.B., and R.G. Thorpe. 1996. The nutritive value of crop residues and agronomic aspect of some fodders in Nigeria hay and dried crop resdue. J. Britt. Grassolsoc. 19:77-80.

Reddy, D.V. 2001. Applied Nutrition. Oxford and IHB Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd New Delhi, pp: 87-89.

Shahid, R., S.H. Raza, and A. Tanveer. 2008. Rumen metabolism of sheep fed silage containing poultry litter poster. FAO electronic conference on tropical silage. www.n0143855.servername.com/fulltex.

Shetton, H.M. 2004. Importance of tree resources from dry feeding and impact on productivity or livestock farms. Proceedings of 2nd international symposium on silvopastoralsystems. The importance of silvopastoral systems in rural livelihood to provide ecosystem services. Universidad Autonoma de Yuctan, mexico. pp: 158-174.

Smith, O.B., E.L.K. Osafo, and A.A. Adegbola. 1988. Studies on the feeding values of agro industrial by-products: Strategies for improving the utilization of cocoa-podbased diets by ruminants. Animal Feed Science and Technology 20: 1189-1201.

Smith, T., S.H. Godfrey, P.J. Buttery, E. Sewannyane, and E. Owen. 2005. Small stock in development. Proceedings of a workshop on enhancing the contribution of small livestock to the livelihoods of resource-poor communities. Harare, Zimbabwe.

Soca, M., L. Simon, O. Ceceres, and A.G. Francisco. 1999. Nutritive value of hay from free legumes, albizialebbeck. Pasos-y-ferrajes. 22:353-358.

Steel, R.G.D., and J.H. Torrie. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. A Biometric Approach, 2nd ed. McGraw Hill book Co., New York., U.S.A.

Sunstol, F., T. Coxworth, and D.N. Mowat. 1999. Improving the Nutritive Value of Straw and other Low-Quality Forages by Treatment with Ammonia. World Animal Review. 6:13.

Taun, A.K., D.B. Okai, E.R. Orskor, D.J. Kyle, F.D. green halgh, F.Y. Obese, and P.K. Kaukasi. 1996. Insacco dry matter degradability and gas production characteristics of some Ghanian feeds. Livestock research for rural Development. 8:1.

Topps, J.H. 1992. Potential composition and use of legumes shrubs and trees and fodders for livestock in the tropics. J. Agric sci. lamb. 118:1-8.

Van Soest, P.J. 1992. Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminants (A Review). O. and B. Books Incorporation, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.

Zarah, A.I., I.D. Mohammed, and F.I. Abbator, 2014. Rumen degradation characteristics of multinutrient blocks in semi-arid region of Nigeria. Int. J. Agric. Sc. & Vet. Med. 2(1):75-81.


Refbacks



Copyright (c) 2018 Global Journal of Animal Scientific Research

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.