Evaluation of Prospects Cattle Stallions of the Breed Simmental and Simbrah

Nelson Manzanares-Miranda, Horacio Villalón-Mendoza, Gustavo Moreno Degollado

Abstract


For Mexico, the units of agricultural and forestry production is the main land use in the country, covering 57.3% of the country. In this regard, the state of Nuevo Leon, has a surface density which amounts to little more than 5.5 million hectares, representing 86% of the state, with an inventory totaling 386.474 cattle heads, ranking 20, domestic production of beef. Additionally, in Nuevo León per capita consumption of that meat is 37 kg per year. The country's highest, above the national average of 21 kg. Watching this scene and Simmental breeds Simbrah an alternative to meet the needs of the state of meat production, based on the sustainability of natural resources, the nature of these breeds. Therefore, studies are needed to corroborate the ability to adapt to the ecological and economic conditions in the country of these two races promise for domestic producers, especially in northern Mexico. The aim of this study was to evaluate different production traits of economic importance of breeds Simmental and Simbrah under a suitable environment and uniform. Behavioral tests were used to evaluate stallion prospects. The study was performed in 4 months of observation, in Linares, Nuevo León, Mexico. It was making measurements monthly. The variables evaluated were: daily gain for the period (ADG), daily gain for age (GDE), weight adjusted to 365 days, loin eye area, intramuscular fat percentage, back fat, genetic markers (smooth and marbling), body size and scrotal circumference. The results showed that the Simmental breed behaved than the Simbrah for variables: daily weight gain and increase in final weight, no statistically significant differences compared to other variables.


Keywords


Stallions; Simbrah; Simmental; Daily ain; Scrotal circumference

Full Text:

PDF XML

References


Archer J.A., and L. Bergh. 2000. Duration of performance tests for growth rate, feed intake and feed efficiency in four biological types of beef cattle. Livestock Production Science. 65 (2000): 47–55.

Barth A.D. 1997. Evaluation of potential breeding soundness of the bull. Youngquist, Current therapy in large animal theriogenology,1st ed., Pennsylvania, U.S.A, W.B. Saunders. pp: 222-236.

Brown, Jr. A.H., J.J. Chewning, Z.B. Johnson, W.C. Loe, C.J. Brown. 1991. Effects of 84-, 112-, and 140-day postweaning feedlot performance tests for beef bulls. J. Animal Sci. 69:451–461.

CDA (Corporation for the Agricultural Development of Nuevo Leon). 2008. Diagnosis of the agricultural sector and aquaculture of the state of Nuevo Leon. Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico. pp: 25-28.

Franklin, C.L., W.V. Thayne, W.R. Wagner, L.P. Stevens, E.K. Inskeep. 1987. Factors affecting gain of beef bulls consigned to a central test station. Bulletin 693, Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station. West Virginia University, Morgantown, USA. pp: 20-25.

Hernández, C.H., A.G. Anchondo, A.G. Ramírez, J.A.G. Ortega, and Y.A. Estrada. 1995. Evaluation of bullocks Salers under test of behavior under conditions of irrigated pasture. In: Proceedings of the Meeting of the Mexican Association of Animal Production. Government of the State of Baja California Sur, Autonomous University of Baja California Sur and Mexican Association of Animal Production. Baja California Sur, Mexico. pp: 13-17.

INEGI. 2007. Methodological Synthesis VIII Census of Agriculture, Livestock and Forestry. 1th ed. Pages. 1-3. National Institute of Statistics and Geography (INEGI). Aguasacalientes, Mexico.

Johnson H.W., A.J. Thompson, J. Kumi-Diaka, W.J. Wilton and B.I. Mandell. 1995. The determination and correlation of reproductive parameters of performance-tested hereford and simmental bulls. Theriogenology. 44:973-982.

Kemp, R.A. 1990. Relationships among test length and absoluteand relative growth rate in central bull tests. J. Animal Sci. 68: 624–629.

López, R. 1981. Summary of Progress of Research. Trustees of the Livestock Research Center of the State of Sonora. Sonora, Mexico. 48 p.

Mexican Association Simmental Simbrah. 2014. History of the Simmental. http://www.simmentalsimbrah.com.mx/historia_simmental.html. Online Magazine. Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico. pp: 1-4.

Renand, G., M.N. Fouilloux and F. Menissier. 1998. Genetic improvement in beef production traits by performance testing beef bulls in France. Pages 77–80 in Proc. 6th World Congr. Vol. 23. Genet. Appl. Livest. Prod., Armidale, Australia.

Rodríguez-Almeida, F.A. 1997. Strategies for the establishment of programs for genetic evaluation of beef cattle. First Forum for the analysis of the genetic resources of the bovine cattle. Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas. Cd. Victoria, Tamaulipas, Mexico. Pag. 49.

Sagarpa. 2002. Report on the situation of the Animal Genetic Resources (RGP) in Mexico. Mexico, D.F. 50 pages.

Swiger, L.A., L.N. Hazel. 1961. Optimum length of feeding period in selecting for gain of beef cattle. J. Animal Sci. 20:189–194.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c)